
|
Designing
an Entertainment
District
When Grand Rapids
city officials get together to talk business,
a discussion of downtown’s hottest
nightspots doesn’t typically thread
into the conversation. Over the last 17 months,
however, Design Plus architect Vern Ohlman
has managed to get the topic on quite a few
agendas. Not to worry; Ohlman isn’t
trying to devolve the serious business of
city government. On the contrary, his work
has been an attempt to further the continuing
evolution of GR’s central city.
By Curt Wozniak
|
In May 2002, in partnership with Frederick Howell,
principal of Millennium Research Group Ltd., and
Ron VanSteeland, retired vice president for finance
and administration at Grand Valley State University,
Ohlman completed a preliminary feasibility study
for an entertainment district in downtown Grand
Rapids.
Ohlman said the impetus for the $25,000 study,
which was sponsored by the Grand Rapids Chamber
of Commerce and funded by Design Plus, the Frey
Foundation, Rockford Construction and Peter Secchia,
was "getting the core of the city to be the
most healthy, viable economic center." The
study found that one way to encourage that type
of development would be to design an entertainment
district downtown similar to the Arena District
in Columbus, Ohio, or Beale Street in Memphis,
Tenn.
"
People are already doing this in other cities;
we’re just following them," Susan Shannon
said. Shannon is GR’s economic development
director. After hearing Ohlman’s presentation,
Shannon got on board.
She secured a $40,000 Michigan
Economic Development Corp. (MEDC) grant to hire
a consultant and continue the research. The MEDC
grant was matched by an additional $40,000 from
the Downtown Development Authority (DDA).
"
It seemed like the DDA focuses a lot of its attention
on the physical improvements of downtown," explained
Jay Fowler, DDA executive director. "This
was an opportunity to look at what we can do to
improve the offerings, the activities that would
attract people downtown to the environment we’ve
created."
Ohlman is pleased with how well-received his
group’s
findings have been, but he was quick to point out
that designing a future for downtown’s entertainment
industry will be tricky business. "Everybody
agrees: It all looks like a very good thing for
the most part," he said. "Getting it
there, making it happen is where it gets troublesome."
In their study, Ohlman, Howell and VanSteeland
defined the entertainment district by its key
characteristics. It is contiguous, made up
of diverse entertainment
opportunities (nightclubs, restaurants, movies,
performing arts, cultural activities, etc.)
clustered together. It is usually no more than
four to
six blocks in width or length. It is pedestrian-friendly.
Besides possessing unity through purpose, it
looks
unified through common lighting and/or signage.
By these characteristics, defining the boundaries
of a downtown Grand Rapids entertainment district
presents a serious problem.
"
In Grand Rapids, our venues are a little more scattered
than that," VanSteeland explained. "The
central entertainment area stretches from South
Ionia to the convention center. If you look at
the distance between those, especially in the wintertime,
that’s rather formidable."
As both Ohlman and VanSteeland pointed out,
many cities with established entertainment
districts
offer shuttle service, which is sometimes even
free, to connect disparate ends of the district.
In Grand Rapids, however, even free public
transportation may not be able to tie a district
together.
"
We’re very car happy in GR," VanSteeland
said. "We love our parking lots. We want to
be able to park next to every building we go to.
But we have to find a way to get people beyond
that."
He
continued, "I think the agenda is a complicated
one. There are lots of things that need to
be done." GR
Curt Wozniak is the Grand Rapids Magazine
staff writer.
|